All rows are candidates only. No candidate is an affinity vote. Reported support is inherited automatic evidence, not a reviewed manuscript count.
Textual leads: at least 120 normalized characters; all order leads retained. Priority combines reported support and size, for review only. Repeated gap spans are grouped, with every original row retained.
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: partly_reviewed — Prior image reviews in config/passage_structure.json confirm BA in two witnesses; current source text supports BA in the listed witnesses. Uniform opposition to print does not establish a manuscript-family split. Witness decisions and next steps
Related modeled loci (not a blanket validation of this lead): p.order-1264-1265
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: partly_reviewed — Entry1192 is split: its oak/acorn opening precedes1193, while its Menahot utensil comparison follows1193 and intervening council material. Whole-entry BA is invalid; model A1-B-C-A2. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: partly_reviewed — Current source supports B before A. The older register supplies no opposing manuscript order at this locus, so this is not yet a manuscript-family split. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Review: partly_reviewed — בל: Sn visibly preserves the substantial sixty/sixty-one measures explanation; reported distribution remains an unreviewed lead. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — All three purported BA witnesses (J5,P2,Z) have image-confirmed AB. Current text of all five older AB witnesses agrees. The sole older 5:3 family split dissolves. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Controlled automatic lead, not confirmed absence. Search for relocation and inspect the preserved transition.
Review: partly_reviewed — מגרס: N omission is false; the passage is present under spelling מגס one opening earlier. Ci transcription also preserves substantial text; J5/S3 need image review. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Review: partly_reviewed — נשא: L2 is falsely listed lacking; it preserves the supposed addition after the Nun closing poem at the beginning of Samekh. This is at least partly a location/segmentation difference. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Controlled automatic lead, not confirmed absence. Search for relocation and inspect the preserved transition.
Review: partly_reviewed — מטרפס: Nc omission is false; the target is present with heading מטורפס. Other four reported absences require revised local boundaries. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Controlled automatic lead, not confirmed absence. Search for relocation and inspect the preserved transition.
Review: partly_reviewed — פרפורא: N10 omission is false; the purple robe explanation lies on next opening. Other reported lacking witnesses have strong nearby transcription hits. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Image shows an explicitly cross-referenced extract: right ends tsan with a referral to nekhasim and left begins tiyuvta. A gap against continuous Arukh is not a demonstrated scribal omission in this excerpting source. Check catalogue scope and neighboring selections before any genealogical coding. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Image confirms right Aleph entries facing left Dalet entries, with left folio numbered 82. This is a physical/page-order discontinuity, not a continuous scribal transition; locate intervening leaves elsewhere (older register reports 51.3% recovery) and reconstruct foliation. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Image confirms Pe text on right and Qof on left, left folio marked 86. Both boundaries run within entries. This is not an intact local omission transition. Check binding/leaf loss and other digitization before assigning cause. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Second digitization of previously inspected J3 Pe/Qof discontinuity, folio86. Same physical opening and same truncated contexts; collapse duplicate evidence. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Review: partly_reviewed — צמח: Ci image preserves a substantial explanation of צמחונין and soaking sprouting produce; distribution needs further review. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — N5 physically intact opening jumps from חלק-family right to כמר-family left, skipping letters. This is a codicological discontinuity candidate; wider leaf/quire history required, not a single inherited deletion. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Review: partly_reviewed — לפי: J3 image preserves the extended stain-attribution discussion; not yet a reviewed contrast across manuscripts. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Controlled automatic lead, not confirmed absence. Search for relocation and inspect the preserved transition.
Review: partly_reviewed — קמי: L omission is false; source links failed to locate it, but whole-witness retrieval recovered the passage. M/Mw2 remain unresolved. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
L: No aligned context located; inspect the source separately.
M: No aligned context located; inspect the source separately.
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Z right page84 upper half hidden by a sheet; bottom מר, left85 סמטא. Large cross-letter jump cannot be separated from missing/displaced leaves with these exposed portions alone. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Two surviving leaves: right starts Tsadi and ends tsb; left starts mid-qnuf. Fragmentary coverage and major page jump prevent a preserved absence determination. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Nc opening jumps from אן discussion to אשקלתא/אשר; pale pencilled lacuna note appears at upper left. Physical/codicological loss needs reading before any inherited omission coding. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Right page 194 ends in qdsh; left 195 begins mid-discussion in qsh. Repaired edges and otherwise legible text do not establish original leaf continuity. Catalogue losses make this a physical-sequence question; no absence vote. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Cp right ends סלסל and left begins עצב-family, crossing letter boundary. Intact written faces do not demonstrate original adjacency; missing leaves/displaced folios must be excluded. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — J3 right מחץ, left נד then chapter4→5. Large cross-letter discontinuity at opening; source foliation/leaf order reconstruction required, not a textual innovation. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: partly_reviewed — Current source supports B before A. The older register supplies no opposing manuscript order at this locus, so this is not yet a manuscript-family split. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: partly_reviewed — N3 image confirms BA. The body/ritual-purity discussion occupies the right leaf and left top, before the eunuch/gwaza discussion midway down the left leaf. N and Sn remain transcription-supported BA; L4 A is not securely retrieved. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: partly_reviewed — Current source supports B before A. The older register supplies no opposing manuscript order at this locus, so this is not yet a manuscript-family split. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: partly_reviewed — Current source supports B before A. The older register supplies no opposing manuscript order at this locus, so this is not yet a manuscript-family split. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: partly_reviewed — Prior image reviews in config/passage_structure.json confirm BA in two witnesses; current source text supports BA in the listed witnesses. Uniform opposition to print does not establish a manuscript-family split. Witness decisions and next steps
Related modeled loci (not a blanket validation of this lead): p.order-467-468
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — N14 left folio 22 is a full leaf of later text opposite q-material on the right. The discontinuity crosses distinct leaves; no scribal join between the detector flanks is established. Audit fragment assembly/leaf order before any absence claim. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — S3 pages34/35 juxtapose מעפרת and נקמז, a large cross-letter discontinuity despite consecutive modern page numbers. Examine quire/leaf loss; no textual deletion vote. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: artifact — Both pages visibly contain repeated שר headings and שר legal discussions; alleged שד left anchor appears to be ד/ר recognition or alignment error. Whole שד→שר gap should not be a deletion character. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — J3 right moves through לן/לק/לש while left starts מנפול/מנ material. Large jump at intact opening suggests leaf-order/loss problem; chapter numeration changes too. Audit whole codex sequence. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — J3 right נד chapter3→4 and left סבן; left folio32. More cross-letter discontinuity in already nonmonotonic scan sequence; reconstruct leaf order before absence. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Image shows separate damaged leaves mounted together, right Aspargos area and left Arg- entries with large holes and missing margins. Catalogue explicitly describes disjoint fragments. Cannot code the interval as an inherited absence. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Alternate photograph of Sp6 disjoint Aspargos/Arg leaves. Huge holes, abrasion and disconnected fragment edges; no continuous local transition exists. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Sp6 damaged fragment opening juxtaposes בזק and בעא/בעל; no preserved original join demonstrated. Disjoint-fragment codicology needed, not an inherited deletion state. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Duplicate photograph of the same Sp6 opening as image35 (identical stains/tears/text). בזק→בע material cannot count independently; original fragment succession unresolved. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Third digitization of same damaged Sp6 opening seen in images34/35; identical text and leaf tears confirm dependence. No preserved sequential join. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — N right page ends חלט while left starts חצ-family and later chapter14→15. Intact photographed opening does not explain large alphabetical jump; check displaced/missing leaves and catchword. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Cp opening shows qn/qp entries on right and qr entries on left, both beginning/ending amid discussions. This broad jump crosses leaf faces; no intact scribal join observed. Audit fragment sequence and omitted photographs, not a textual absence vote. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — After opening has almost entirely blank/washed-out right leaf and left continues at er-. Before ends at atr. Loss of readable intervening leaf/text is visible; not a preserved omission transition. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — N14 opening has a dark upper left area obscuring several lines; right qh/qby material and left later q-material occupy separate leaves. No intact local skip established; audit fragment/leaf order and improve dark flank image. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Individual pages: first has tsd discussion and a tape/repaired band; second folio72 begins tsrp and closes Tsadi. Large skipped block crosses physical folio boundary, requires codicological order check. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Controlled automatic lead, not confirmed absence. Search for relocation and inspect the preserved transition.
Review: partly_reviewed — גדנף: P omission is false; the complete core discussion is visible at next page. Mf/N6 have substantial local transcription matches too. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Both boundary images inspected: fol158v ends at the opening of traksin and fol159r begins mid-entry before kdn. Catalogue expressly records lost leaves traksin-kdn. Consecutive modern foliation does not make this a textual omission; abstain for physical lacuna. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Opening is severely torn/darkened at upper inner edges; right רשע and left שט are separated by damaged/illegible material. Do not score textual omission without codicological sequence and missing-area assessment. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Controlled automatic lead, not confirmed absence. Search for relocation and inspect the preserved transition.
Review: unresolved — פסקטר: Ci image reviewed but dense cursive and repeated פס headings prevent a secure absence judgment; Nc retrieval suggests a relocated positive passage. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — J3 right ends מגוש and left opens מל material. Both pages legible; multiple similar discontinuities in J3 make codicological reconstruction prerequisite to textual coding. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Right page shows שור/שו material; left begins שלשלות/שלשול and a chapter boundary. Check displaced leaves and surrounding openings before attributing the jump to textual omission. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Right esr discussion faces left Pe/fgl material; left leaf visibly repaired and abraded with lost text near top. Catalogue loss and binding require adjudication. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — N14 opening has a large physical loss at the upper inner part of the left leaf, taking multiple lines; visible left text reaches רקע and later resh entries, while right has רג/רד. This cannot license a twenty-four-thousand-character textual absence. Lost/damaged coverage and the original sequence must be resolved first. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Controlled automatic lead, not confirmed absence. Search for relocation and inspect the preserved transition.
Review: partly_reviewed — חלתית: N3 absence is false; the citations and gloss are present near bottom of the page. N6/W remain unreviewed. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — N13 right ends נקד after chapter10/11, left starts סדן with later chapter boundary; torn/faded text and a cross-letter jump require missing-leaf audit. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — J3 right מזר/מזק and left מלח, left folio16; same codex has folio13 at later image22. Must restore physical foliation order and inspect intervening leaves. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Both J3 digitizations of opening98 were viewed and show the same physical text: right ends רבצל/בשמים, left begins within רצף and proceeds to chapter17/רק. This is one discontinuity, not independent evidence from two witnesses. The adjacent image97 is in earlier resh material. Original leaf order and missing coverage remain unresolved. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Both J3 digitizations of opening98 were viewed and show the same physical text: right ends רבצל/בשמים, left begins within רצף and proceeds to chapter17/רק. This is the duplicate of the candidate beginning at1323760; count no second character. Original leaf order and missing coverage remain unresolved. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — J5 opening has strong ink bleed-through and an explicit lower left margin note 'kan haser' (here missing). Right folio 194 reaches qsm after a chapter header; left begins mid-discussion. This is physical lacuna evidence, not a genealogical absence. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Right ends aqb, left begins Pe material mid-entry and carries folio85. Same physical opening as alternate digitization next row; dependent page-order/loss event, not an independent omission state. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Alternate photograph of same folio85 opening as prior row. Confirms exact shared discontinuity aqb to Pe across physical leaves; not evidence of two manuscript witnesses. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Sp6 juxtaposes אזל right and אליו left on fragment opening with broken inner edge; catchword below right appears to refer forward beyond current left. Recover fragment sequence before textual omission. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Alternate digitization of identical Sp6 אזל/אליו opening; same inner-edge breaks and text. Not independent evidence; fragment sequence unresolved. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Duplicate exposure of same Sp6 אזל/אליו opening as image12. Physical arrangement, not scribal omission, remains the question. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — S2 opening 290/291 shows qsh material on right and resh material on left; repaired tears affect top right lines and lower margins. Large detector gap crosses leaf boundary. Consecutive modern pagination cannot prove original completeness; no textual absence established. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Controlled automatic lead, not confirmed absence. Search for relocation and inspect the preserved transition.
Review: partly_reviewed — אמתלא: J2 absence is false. The entry spans columns before the long אמתו discussion; HTR interleaves columns. Nc remains unresolved. Witness decisions and next steps
Related modeled loci (not a blanket validation of this lead): p.order-467-468
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Controlled automatic lead, not confirmed absence. Search for relocation and inspect the preserved transition.
Review: image_confirmed — אשם: P and Mf both lack the sacrificial entry at a preserved אשל→אשמתא transition; L2 has the full entry. Witness decisions and next steps
Related modeled loci (not a blanket validation of this lead): p.entry-965
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Ro right page has חס/חף and left חרף. Clear boundary jump with intact pages, but missing or displaced leaves remain possible; check neighboring foliation/catchwords. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Review: partly_reviewed — גמר: P image confirms the extended small/large enclosures argument already modeled for P2/L2. Other reported witnesses remain unreviewed here. Witness decisions and next steps
Related modeled loci (not a blanket validation of this lead): p.gamar-commentary
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — S3 pages18/19 show מהט right and מכן left, with local fading/patching. Intact-looking pages do not exclude pre-foliation leaf loss; check catchword and neighboring openings. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: partly_reviewed — Current source supports B before A. The older register supplies no opposing manuscript order at this locus, so this is not yet a manuscript-family split. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Right aqts material faces left ashq with folio83. Transition lies between leaves, both begin/end within discussions; test misplaced/lost leaves, not inherited absence. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Right page186 in tsf discussion faces187 beginning within Qof material, with torn upper edge/hole. Modern consecutive pagination does not resolve earlier leaf loss; catalogue records many lost leaves. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Controlled automatic lead, not confirmed absence. Search for relocation and inspect the preserved transition.
Review: partly_reviewed — טפף: F absence is false; the substantive Jerusalem expansion extends across the opening. Ca5 remains unresolved. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Ca5: No aligned context located; inspect the source separately.
Review: artifact — מרגן candidate is a cross-work/placement artifact: N9 and W3 images show biblical root lexicography under שוט/שוך, not an Arukh addition at מרגן. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Both openings show a wholly blank facing leaf, before folio180 and after182. The claimed Prsh→tsbt interval spans missing/blank photographed faces, not an intact copied-text join. Audit scan completeness and inserted blanks. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Sp4 TIFF opening inspected: right page ends the qof material (קשייתא); left page begins within the רביע/coin discussion. Right-page catchword does not establish continuity with this left-page incipit. A large alphabetical discontinuity is visible, but original leaf sequence or loss must be established before calling a textual omission. JPG lookup failure was only a storage-format issue. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Controlled automatic lead, not confirmed absence. Search for relocation and inspect the preserved transition.
Review: partly_reviewed — אשה: Mf image confirms the local absence already established in P; source links had omitted Mf because nearby alignment spans were missing. Witness decisions and next steps
Related modeled loci (not a blanket validation of this lead): p.entry-946
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Mf: No aligned context located; inspect the source separately.
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — White strip masks much of left leaf; right Qof opening with poor contrast. Catalogue records missing qbh–qh leaves at178/179, matching this general boundary; neither hidden nor lost text is an absence vote. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Aa consists of photographed fragment leaves, first אבק/אבס and second אד-family; these images do not establish consecutive preserved leaves. Codicological placement required. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Review: partly_reviewed — גבתא: P2 image preserves the extended stopper/squeezing explanation attributed to רבינו מצליח; Mf and contrasting witnesses need image collation. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Right lower margin has loss/abrasion and writing crosses a page boundary into distinct Ayin material. No intact within-line skip established; compare lost-leaf catalogue and exact catchword. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — N right foot טג after chapter boundary; left starts טלם. Preserved pages but large discontinuity; catchword and neighboring leaf order required before assigning textual deletion. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Right Pe/pg discussion and left ptp material begin/end mid-entry. Isolated surviving leaves with faded margins; no intact omission transition demonstrated. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — W first page ends אברויי and next starts late אד entries, both intact written pages. Discontinuity visible, but missing intervening leaves/scans must be checked through foliation and catalogue before scribal deletion. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — S3 opening shows the רב/rabbi discussion and רובין on the right, with רד material on the left. Pencil page numbers 200/201 do not establish original codicological continuity; catalogue flags lacunae. The right-page ending and left-page incipit do not supply a continuous textual join. No inherited omission state certified. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: artifact — N image right page visibly has חרב/חרד/חרז/חרף family, left חרס/חרע/חרף. Alleged חצף left anchor is erroneous (צ/ר reading or anchor placement); broad alphabetical gap not supported by image. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — N15 folio 52 image again crops the lower text edges of both leaves. Right ql entries and left qmqm/qmr entries occupy separate faces; missing photographed text or leaf sequence must be checked before a textual skip is considered. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Photograph presents narrow horizontal sections of two leaves; right Prush material and left pth headings. This format lacks full folio context; verify complete photographs and original leaf order before declaring omission. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Right prsh discussion faces left ptk/ptr material with ending-Pe heading. Page seam skips interior material without a preserved textual join; fragment codicology needed. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Cp right סח and left סכל, some lower right lines faded. Clear page-boundary discontinuity; preceding/following foliation and exact missing span needed. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — J5 image14 has white paper covering inner half of right leaf; left begins מגסתא. Complementary image13 exposes right leaf18. Physical join still jumps לץ to מג; inspect lost leaves, not independent exposure votes. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — J5 image13 is complementary exposure of same opening as14, paper covering inner left. Right18 and left19 modern foliation cannot exclude older leaf loss. Merge exposures and inspect textual continuity. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Right תבל/תבליא page present; left upper portion heavily stained/eroded before readable תייקא and chapter boundary. Physical/photographic loss confounds the gap; need better scan and folio sequence. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Right page numbered230 carries שבע; left231 is heavily faded but has a chapter heading and substantial שד/שו text. Transcription visibility is a major confound, not proof of omitted entries. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Controlled automatic lead, not confirmed absence. Search for relocation and inspect the preserved transition.
Review: image_confirmed — בר בטני: L2 preserves the Bathsheba/Solomon explanation; P and Mf lack it at preserved local transitions. Witness decisions and next steps
Related modeled loci (not a blanket validation of this lead): p.entry-1359
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Two single-page images show שבע/שבר on first and שולנאי/שוירן on second, with extensive marginal annotations. A true discontinuity is possible, but no folio/catchword chain establishes consecutive text-bearing leaves. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Pg images130/131 photograph alternate single written sides with blank facing pages; first ends מח, second begins מי. These are not a shown uninterrupted opening; locate intervening side/exposure before deletion claim. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — TIFF viewed via JPEG viewing copy. Both leaves have repaired tears and large losses around top/margins; right ends prq discussion, left continues mid-prose. The base jump cannot be treated as intact copied omission; collate original foliation and text. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Controlled automatic lead, not confirmed absence. Search for relocation and inspect the preserved transition.
Review: unresolved — פרזדגמא: N15 nominated image is a narrow horizontal strip with פרזל/פרזין/פרזמאות; a complete local absence cannot be established from this framing. Pn also remains unresolved. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — N14 folio 12 opening is substantially legible, right qtr material and left qyr/qyl material. Candidate spans separate faces; no within-line omission join established. Requires leaf sequence and catchword audit. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — S3 pages12/13: right late לש and start מ; left מגור series. Right page heavily faded and patched, so missed text plus possible leaf discontinuity must be assessed. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — N4 right inner column ends אגא/אגד sequence and left starts אד material; catchword below right and intervening leaves need checking. Intact opening alone does not establish complete original succession. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — S3 opening 196/197 shows right qsh entries and left mid-discussion in resh. Both text blocks are legible despite repaired margins. The jump is across leaves, with no observed local scribal join; catalogue/leaf-sequence audit required. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Sp4 TIFF opening70 inspected: right visibly has chapter4 ending, chapter5 heading, רהט/רהיטני, chapter6 and רוח/רווח; left begins within רם and continues later resh material. Modern left folio numbers59,60,61 run across images68–70, but do not by themselves explain the repeated discontinuities across photographed openings. No omission state certified. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — S2 image35 exposes same opening as36 without pointer; identical text/damage confirms duplicate. סם→סן discontinuity remains at leaf boundary; no independent vote. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — S2 right page64 ends סם, left begins סן; narrow inner text obscured by gutter and pointer across right. Need precise transition and quire continuity. Duplicate of image35. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Right leaf damaged/cracked and partly abraded, particularly lower text; facing page opens mid-Aqb discussion. Page-boundary discontinuity not a preserved textual skip. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Nc2 consecutive folios113/114 preserve chapter18→19, then extensive בר series. Several supposed skipped entries are physically present; align chapter boundary and two-column reading before any smaller omission claim. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — J3 right מדן and left מזר across opening; left folio13 occurs at image22, whereas image15 has folio15 and image18 folio16. Scan sequence demonstrably non-monotonic; reconstruct foliation before interpreting gap. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — N15 numbered faces 53/54 are short horizontal strips; bottom lines are cut off, and right qn material is followed across faces by qns/qnb/qnql. Full photographed coverage is unproven. No textual absence vote. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Two individual folio photographs: first labelled23 with py-kor/pyrkws, next begins mid-discussion preceding pla. Physical pages legible but boundary jump not explained; inspect original foliation and adjacent scans before omission claim. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — N13 opening shows qlbn/qlbs followed on the left by qlns and other ql entries. The left lower text and right outer margin are stained. Large detector jump crosses faces rather than an established uninterrupted local join; check alignment and leaf continuity. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — S3 page28 closes מן with chapter12→13; page29 starts מס. Text intact but intervening מן material or physical loss requires exact comparison and quire audit. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Large white strip covers the inner half of left leaf. Both alleged flanks cannot be fully collated from this photograph; photographic obstruction rather than a licensed omission. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — S3 pages68/69: right ends סנדל discussion, left top ססגון partly obscured by dark staining. Check local faded lines and pre-pagination leaf loss; no wholesale absence. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — N15 image is a short horizontal strip of both leaves; text at lower edges is visibly cut off (left folio 50). Right ql material and left qls material cannot establish full-page continuity. Treat photographic/page coverage as unknown, not an absence. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — N15 folio 55 is another short horizontal photograph with lower text clipped. Right qn/qp material and chapter marker followed by left qts discussion are on separate faces. Cannot certify complete interval coverage; inspect full leaf images before absence scoring. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Right bottom epr discussion faces left continuation around aqts; no within-line omission transition. Chapter markers visible. Foliation77 and neighboring leaves must be mapped before deciding missing leaf versus reorder. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — A white physical strip covers much of left page and gutter, hiding text. Imaging obstruction directly defeats absence inference; reacquire unobstructed photograph. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Both boundary images viewed. Consecutive image228 and229 have left leaves numbered224 and226 respectively. Text jumps from shh- to shtp across the opening boundary; physical loss, missing scan or altered foliation remains unresolved. Initial lost-left-page hypothesis was withdrawn after checking source geometry; no extraction failure is established. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: artifact — Digitization-order artifact: P234 leaf230 and P235 leaf232 bracket leaf231, preserved at P233 (viewed). Scan IDs do not reflect foliation. Do not encode as textual omission. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: artifact — P2 scan order is demonstrably displaced: image18 already contained אגירייסין at foot (viewed for other candidate), image20 returns to end of אב then אג and chapter2, image21 continues אגירייסין. Apparent gap comes from intervening wrongly ordered pages. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Right ends pnda and left begins mid-ps description, folio157. No physical damage at boundary, but missing-leaf/reorder versus copied omission unresolved; requires folio/catchword controls. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Controlled automatic lead, not confirmed absence. Search for relocation and inspect the preserved transition.
Review: partly_reviewed — חו: P lacks the informer/liability passage at the preserved חדת→chapter boundary→חוטף transition. P2 remains unreviewed. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Opening has right שפר series and left שקף/שקץ then chapter19/20 and שר; possible local compression/jump requires checking the exact שפר ending and neighboring שק entries. No verified absent block. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Right page lower text is heavily faded/abraded and columns continue at left with different Ab-entries, folio8. Page boundary and damaged text prevent exact preserved-transition test. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Dark but text-bearing opening: right page has extensive שן material; left starts further שן then שע and שעמום discussion. Several intervening entries remain physically present. Re-transcribe boundaries; no wholesale gap vote. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — S opening 260/261 has a large white paper strip covering the inner half of the left page throughout its height. The potentially missing material is not observable under this obstruction. Obtain unobstructed photograph; abstain. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Sn left foliation 365 then 367 and extensive lost outer leaf edges. Intermediate leaf and damaged text must be resolved before textual absence. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Facing leaf top starts Aqeb after right long esr discussion; no within-line join of the claimed boundaries. Intact surviving pages do not prove intervening leaves never existed; inspect foliation/catchwords. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — N3 opening has large missing areas at left upper and outer edges plus black stains on right. תפס/תר material survives but continuity cannot establish textual omission across physical losses. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Image right ends gs discussion and left begins mid-discussion before gf; a chapter ending appears within the right page. Page-boundary discontinuity remains unresolved; collate exact catchword and preceding/following leaves before calling an omission. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — P2 first page ends אברזין discussion; next begins continuation before אגף. Both surfaces intact but the page sequence is not proved complete; inspect foliation and missing scan/leaf possibilities. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Controlled automatic lead, not confirmed absence. Search for relocation and inspect the preserved transition.
Review: partly_reviewed — טע: P lacks the forgotten Sabbath/festival blessing passage at an intact טסקא→טעם transition. Mf remains unreviewed. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — N images346 and344 inspected. Image346 right ends with רשם while left opens within רתך and then the resh ending. Image344 left visibly preserves רשם and רשף material within the purported gap. Thus text absent from the local serialized join survives elsewhere; distinguish file/leaf sequence from a scribal transposition before coding an order character. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Sp4 TIFF opening69 inspected: right closes chapter2 and begins chapter3 with רג; left begins within the רד discussion. A catchword and a physical photographic opening alone do not prove a preserved textual join. Compare omitted chapter/leaf sequence before assigning absence. Text along the right-page fold is damaged. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Controlled automatic lead, not confirmed absence. Search for relocation and inspect the preserved transition.
Review: partly_reviewed — סנן: Pr omission is false; target is clearly present one page before nominated context. W transcription likewise preserves it one page earlier. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Right leaf has large central/lower loss with horizontal tear and faded text; tsar discussion faces tsapir material. Damage and leaf sequence must be controlled; no omission vote. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — L3 first leaf ends אח material, next begins אט-family including אטלקי. Pages intact but reading continuity and lost/displaced leaves need wider sequence check. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — J3 opening99 inspected: right runs through רק, רקד and רקם, ending within the bird-sign explanation; left starts mid-explanation of incision/rishum, then רשע and רשף. The mismatch between the right ending and left incipit requires a leaf-order/loss audit before a textual omission can be inferred. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: artifact — Digitization-order artifact: P232 left leaf229, P233 left leaf231; intervening leaf230 is actually P234 (viewed for related candidate). Missing sequence is not evidence of manuscript omission; reorder scan before alignment. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Both faces of this opening are legible. The alleged gap lies across the page boundary (left folio 204), not at an observed uninterrupted scribal join. Foliation/catchword and intervening-leaf audit needed; no textual absence vote. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Leaves paginated86/87; left lower text extensively washed/abraded. Claimed aqb→ar spans page boundary with damaged text; absent state not warranted. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — J consecutive folios פה/פו preserve extensive בר entries across both openings. Broad gap includes visible text; exact ברספינה boundary needs transcription alignment, no wholesale absence. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — S2 opening numbered 280/281 is substantially legible with repaired lower edges; right qr material and left qrdm/qrsm entries are separated by the page boundary. No intact local omission join observed; compare catchword and leaf sequence with detector anchors. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Right ends ash-n smoke discussion; left begins mid-Pe exposition, with added margin notes. Page seam is not continuous local join; recover missing/misordered material and inspect chapter ending. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — S opening 276/277 again has white paper covering the inner half of the left page. Right qpt material is readable; left continuation is obstructed throughout. This image cannot provide negative evidence; retrieve unobstructed scan. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Intact opening numbered320/321 preserves several intervening שו/שח headings including שחם and שחט material. Broad gap cannot be coded wholesale absent; exact intervals require local transcription realignment. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Sp4 TIFF viewing copy shows clear complete faces, left folio 49, right chapter closures/openings through qts and left further qts entries. Catchword below right page appears to require continuation; exact alignment and catchword-to-left incipit check remains needed. No positive-controlled textual omission established. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Right page 238 ends in qh; left 239 begins continuation before qzmqrtwr/qtr. Lower left is faded/abraded. The gap crosses the page boundary; exact foliation and catchword audit required, no preserved local omission demonstrated. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: artifact — Written left foliation97 to99; opening100 seen for previous candidate bears98. Demonstrated nonmonotonic digital opening order, not evidence of textual omission. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Ci left folios82 then84; intermediate83 absent from pair. Locate interleaved folio83 before deciding ספסקא→ספר omission. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Opening preserves שק-family entries and chapter 18/19/20 transitions; right page heavily faded. Broad gap crosses text-bearing material; exact interval requires local transcription. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Sp4 TIFF copy shows left folio 58 with qrsh/qrt material and chapter transition. Right page ends in qrph with catchword below; next face begins mid-discussion. Need exact catchword and sequence audit. Left central lines are abraded; no absence vote. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Sp4 image 67 repeats the same physical opening as image 66: folio 58, identical chapter transition, stains, and text. These two leads are dependent duplicate-photo/alignment cases, not separate omissions. Catchword/leaf continuity still needs audit; no absence vote. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Ci left folios64 then66; folio65 absent from this pair. Apparent סבן→סג interval may be interleaved scanning, as proved elsewhere in Ci. Locate folio65. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Right page carries dense שף text, with faded central lines; left has שפתלא/שפט/שפן/שפף headings. Physical text remains at broad gap; exact segmentation and faint-line transcription needed. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Controlled automatic lead, not confirmed absence. Search for relocation and inspect the preserved transition.
Review: partly_reviewed — שתית: P nominated page has no cereal-blessing passage, but order near the Shin ending differs; full local boundary review remains necessary. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: artifact — Written foliation158→160 across consecutive files. Find folio159 elsewhere before comparing text; same Ci page-order defect family. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Coordinator located the scan as TIFF in nas_geniza/NLI_GNIZA and inspected a JPEG viewing copy. Right page visibly has shachar/prayer material; left starts inside the flaying/hide discussion and continues shtach, shtaf, shtar. Holes and damaged/worn text occur on both leaves. The photographic adjacency does not establish an intact textual join; resolve leaf order/loss and exact block boundaries before inferring a textual omission. The photograph is available; the earlier missing-image statement concerned the wrong JPG archive path. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Left written foliation122 then124 across consecutive opening images. Same digital-order/lacuna hazard as earlier Ci; locate123 in neighboring inventory before deciding textual change. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Ci left folios68 then70; intermediate69 not in pair. סח→סט apparent gap requires recovering interleaved/missing folio69, not textual deletion. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: artifact — Ci scan ordering: images76/77 left folios74/76, while image78 preserves intervening75 (viewed). סמדר→סמניא gap is scan-order artifact; restore folio75. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Before image66 inspected: left folio63 and Nun ending/Samekh beginning are legible; both extracted halves plausibly correspond to respective physical pages. After image not yet viewed. This rejects a blanket lost-half explanation for all Ci gaps; exact omission/relocation remains unadjudicated. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — S3 badly faded right has לחש, left begins chapter11→12 and לכ material. Fading affects large areas; recover faint text and exact boundary before absence. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Image shows substantial torn lower margins on both leaves. Right ends abalsamos; left starts within the Hai explanation and continues abanim. Damage is visible; no intact omission transition. Compare other digitization and map missing material to torn area or intervening leaf. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Alternate photograph of earlier Sp Abalsamos/aben discontinuity. Torn lower margins visible on both leaves; same damage event and manuscript, not independent textual evidence. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: artifact — Written left foliation jumps96 to98 across these images. Missing intervening folio97 is actually the next candidate's opening101. Image sequence is nonmonotonic; reconstruct order before scoring. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: artifact — Ci images78/79 left folios75/77 while folio76 preserved at image77 (viewed). סמניא→סן apparent gap depends on same interleaved scan order, not textual omission. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Ci images have left foliation 244 then 246; intermediate folio 245 not shown in this pair. Suspect scan ordering like the shin examples; locate folio 245 before scoring omission. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — Left foliation147 then149 in consecutive images. Missing/reordered148 must be recovered before textual comparison; does not show inherited omission. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Cp right ends סגניות/סגנים, left starts סדן. Photographed text-bearing leaves intact but fading and missing-leaf succession remain; exact join/catchword audit needed. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Ci3 upper portions of all four columns blackened/obscured, including the אלנ/אלפ interval. Several surviving אלפ-family headings visible; damaged visibility precludes absence. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: partly_reviewed — J3 image96 right has the רבע coin calculation; left begins בן הבשמים, רבץ, רבק and chapter3. Additional image98 right visibly preserves more רבע material (tasting/reviit and the quarter-area discussions), while image97 right is already at רג/רד. The photographed/file sequence requires reconstruction; the range is not certified absent throughout the manuscript. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Never an absence vote: inspect foliation, physical loss, digitization order, flanking alignment and possible relocation.
Review: unresolved — Sp right ends כהן; left starts continuation and כוז, but upper left is badly faded/water-damaged. Read damaged top and catchword before any omission state. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: partly_reviewed — Current source supports B before A. The older register supplies no opposing manuscript order at this locus, so this is not yet a manuscript-family split. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: partly_reviewed — Current source supports B before A. The older register supplies no opposing manuscript order at this locus, so this is not yet a manuscript-family split. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: partly_reviewed — Current source supports B before A. The older register supplies no opposing manuscript order at this locus, so this is not yet a manuscript-family split. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: partly_reviewed — Current source supports B before A. The older register supplies no opposing manuscript order at this locus, so this is not yet a manuscript-family split. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — Nc image shows AB; the older BA call is false. The enlarged metzulah heading precedes matzlif in the middle of the right leaf. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — S image shows AB; the older BA call is false. The thief/fear discussion continues at the top of the right leaf before the ganava sarya discussion midway down; the paper covering the left leaf does not obscure this order. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — J4 is an annotated printed edition, not a manuscript witness to this body-text order. The candidate cannot establish a manuscript structural innovation. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — AB: left leaf upper third has bundles/animal fodder before flogging/whip discussion. Photos176 and177 reproduce same opening, with a marginal flap displaced; not two sequential copies of this passage. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — J4 is an annotated printed edition, not a manuscript witness to this body-text order. The candidate cannot establish a manuscript structural innovation. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — J4 is an annotated printed edition, not a manuscript witness to this body-text order. The candidate cannot establish a manuscript structural innovation. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — J4 is an annotated printed edition, not a manuscript witness to this body-text order. The candidate cannot establish a manuscript structural innovation. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: image_confirmed — W2 image confirms BA. The oesophagus/trachea block at the bottom of the right column precedes the thousandfold/Torah-column simile at the top of the left column. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — J4 is an annotated printed edition, not a manuscript witness to this body-text order. The candidate cannot establish a manuscript structural innovation. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — J4 is an annotated printed edition, not a manuscript witness to this body-text order. The candidate cannot establish a manuscript structural innovation. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: image_confirmed — N11 image confirms BA. In the bilingual handwritten layout, forced royal service is visible at the top of the right column; scissors occurs lower in that column after other senses. Source independence from printed editions remains unestablished. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: image_confirmed — W image confirms BA. The facial-appearance explanation at the top of the left column precedes the aspect/root discussion midway down the left column. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: partly_reviewed — Entry7926 has material before and after7927: inspect previous page and separate the egg tube reference from blood/purity tube block; do not label whole-entry BA. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: image_confirmed — Genuine manuscript contrast established: W2 BA; L2 and P AB, all image inspected. W2 places the glass-vessel block after the treasury block and intervening shofar/calendar material. Witness decisions and next steps
Related modeled loci (not a blanket validation of this lead): p.order-7932-7933
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: image_confirmed — N11 is a nineteenth-century bilingual manuscript with complex columns; B appears above A within the right-page second column, requiring layout-aware review. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — J4 is an annotated printed edition, not a manuscript witness to this body-text order. The candidate cannot establish a manuscript structural innovation. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: image_confirmed — Nc2 image confirms BA. The fig-variety shetein block in the upper right column of the left leaf precedes the plugged-opening shutum discussion lower in that column. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — Pg image shows AB; the older BA call is false. Shop shutters precede shields/scholars in the upper part of the right leaf. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — Sp6 image shows AB; the older BA call is false. Despite holes elsewhere, argestos begins at the bottom of the right column on the left leaf and continues at the top of its left column, before the ard heading. This establishes local order without asserting completeness. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — A starts at bottom of left leaf in opening50; B begins at top of right leaf opening51. Later A-like common phrase is not a second whole A block. Whole-entry BA rejected. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — A linen/garments discussion starts lower left page88 and continues page89 top before B needles/hooks discussion. Whole-entry BA rejected; any isolated A-like later material needs separate block analysis. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — Mw image shows AB; the older BA call is false. The architectural-window discussion precedes the sparks discussion in the upper third of the right leaf. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — N12 has no retrieved source context and catalog verdict related (notes on printed Arukh ha-Qatsar). Exclude from manuscript-family affinity. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
N12: No aligned context located; inspect the source separately.
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — F image shows AB; the older BA call is false. The sack heading midway down the left leaf precedes the geb impurity heading below. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: image_confirmed — Current source supports B before A. The older register supplies no opposing manuscript order at this locus, so this is not yet a manuscript-family split. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: image_confirmed — Current source supports B before A. The older register supplies no opposing manuscript order at this locus, so this is not yet a manuscript-family split. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — AB: enlarged gypsum/plaster heading above enlarged olive-press residue heading at bottom of page. Old BA is false. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — AB: right column lower half has lookout/signaling-platform explanation before Dedan discussion. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — AB: left column upper third has looking/direction discussion before grief discussion; same physical page as1932/1933. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — N4 image shows AB; the older BA call is false. The image contradicts BOTH the old BA register and current serialized HTR: damakh ends at the bottom of the right column of the right leaf; daminu begins at the top of its left column. The HTR interleaves columns, placing left-column opening lines before right-column ending lines. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — Ci3 image shows AB; the older BA call is false. The image contradicts BOTH the old BA register and current serialized HTR: the oak explanation is at the bottom of the right column on the right leaf; the golden-menorah explanation follows at the top of its left column. Blackened material elsewhere does not obscure these anchors. This is a column-serialization artifact. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — Sp image shows AB; the older BA call is false. The meal/gathering discussion is followed by the peacock entry in the lower right leaf. The second printed lemma label is anomalous, so identification follows the peacock content. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — J image shows AB; the older BA call is false. The kneading/knife discussion precedes the enlarged document-form heading on the right leaf. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — P2 image shows AB; the older BA call is false. Caphtorim/mixed descent precedes the hakkaphtor/Josiah superstructure explanation. This shares a physical page and duplicate-photo dependency with candidate903. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — P2 image shows AB; the older BA call is false. Pillows/cushions precede the stove with detached leg. This shares a physical page and duplicate-photo dependency with candidate901. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — P image shows AB; the older BA call is false. The footwear discussion at the top of the right column precedes the vessel heading about a third of the way down. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — Pg image shows AB; the older BA call is false. The distinctiveness of the Cushites at the top of the right leaf precedes the spindle heading about a quarter of the way down. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — F image shows AB; the older BA call is false. The plant explanation at the top of the left leaf precedes the pot explanation. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — Nc image shows AB; the older BA call is false. The flimsy spiderweb/clothing explanation precedes the tomb-plaster/dissolving-earth explanation in the upper-middle right leaf. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
Direct older order call; verify actual source sequence. Some calls conflict with current transcription. Uniform opposition to print is not a manuscript-family split.
Review: artifact — N3 image shows AB; the older BA call is false. The enlarged olive-press/grinding discussion precedes the family-of-Eli explanation in the middle/lower right leaf. Witness decisions and next steps
Images of candidate source context (alignment is provisional)
